Decoded
Feed

How Good Are Frontier Models at Physics? Expert Re-Grading Reveals Broken Evaluations and Near-Saturation of Leading Benchmarks

arXiv:2609.13009AI11 sep 20261 min readHN ×5PDF

Physicists re-graded six physics benchmarks and found most model 'mistakes' were broken questions or graders.

78.7%

GPT-5.6-Sol HLE-Physics score, corrected

Expert fixes raised the reported score by over 30 points

How it works

  1. Scores look low

    Frontier models score poorly on physics benchmarks, yet physicists using them report strong ability. Something does not add up.

  2. Experts audit failures

    Faculty and grad students check each wrong answer: real model error, grader error, or flawed question and reference solution?

  3. Benchmarks near saturation

    Most failures were benchmark or grader faults. After repairs, top models score roughly 79% to 95% across benchmarks.

failed casesflawed itemsre-gradeSix physicsbenchmarksModelsanswer 4×OriginalgraderExpert auditRepair orexcludeCorrectedscoresfailed casesflawed itemsre-gradeSix physicsbenchmarksModelsanswer 4×OriginalgraderExpert auditRepair orexcludeCorrectedscores
From the paper